Skip to page content

At-A-Glance

Listen to audio:

Composed: 1944-45/1994

Length: c. 30 minutes

Orchestration: 2 violins, 2 violas, 2 cellos, and bass

About this Piece

Much has been said and written about how oblivious Richard Strauss was to the harsher realities of Nazi Germany. Certainly nothing about the regime and its war seemed to affect him as much as the bombing of the Munich National Theater in October 1943. “The burning of the Munich Hoftheater, the place consecrated to the first Tristan and Meistersinger performances, in which 73 years ago I heard Freischütz for the first time, where my good father sat for 49 years as first horn in the orchestra—where at the end of my life I experienced the keenest sense of fulfillment of the dreams of authorship in 10 Strauss productions—this was the greatest catastrophe that has ever been brought into my life, for which there can be no consolation and, in my old age, no hope,” Strauss wrote to his biographer, the Swiss critic Willi Schuh.

Almost immediately Strauss began sketching a Trauer um München (Mourning for Munich). As the news worsened, he also sought the consolations of Goethe, whose ideas about transformation found in his book The Metamorphosis of Plants (1790) and poem “The Metamorphosis of Animals” (1820) inspired Strauss’ concept of the Study for 23 Strings that Metamorphosen became at the behest of Paul Sacher, who conducted the premiere in Zurich in January 1946.

The theme Strauss had first sketched under the “Trauer um München” title has an important role in the great aching arc of Metamorphosen. Four repeated notes and then a bit of a descending minor scale in dotted rhythm, it enters early and unobtrusively and, with three other main themes, is restlessly developed polyphonically. During the last eight minutes, however, it evolves into a clear suggestion of the Funeral March from Beethoven’s “Eroica” Symphony, No. 3, and there Strauss wrote “IN MEMORIAM!” in the score. The memorial was not just for the bombed opera houses, but for the shattered culture that they represented and that Strauss himself had embodied so fruitfully. —John Henken